top of page

Freeman on the Land | Strawman | Birth Certificates | Person vs. Corporation | Taxation

The Name Game Explained

DeTax Canada Blog


Recent research here in Canada shows that the income tax, and all other statutory law, is imposed upon basis of  the 'property right', and that property right is the property right of the corporate Crown in Canada, and corporate State (be it a State or the UNITED STATES) in the USA.


All adult humans are deceived into using the fiction name, as imprinted on the copy of the birth certificate you receive when ordering it from Provincial/State Vital Statistics, or to whatever source you apply. Although the birth certificate is of somewhat recent origin and used to formally offer 'citizens' as chattel in bankruptcy to the Pope's Holy Roman Empire owned Rothschilds' Banking System, the false use of the family name goes back into the Middle Ages in England.


We are then 'forced' or 'obliged' to use that name in all commercial and Government dealings and communications. So, when we do use it, as 99.99% of the human inhabitants of North America (and most of the world) do, we supposedly 'voluntarily' attach ourselves, the free will adult human, to the Crown/State owned property, called the 'legal identity name' as an accessory attached to property owned by Another party. Think of a ship under tow by another ship. Which captain decides what route the ships will take? The ‘legal name/strawman’ is the tow rope, and the towing ship is the corporate (make-believe ship at sea) Crown of the City of London. As an attachment to the legal name owned by the Crown, you are the towed ship, and your vessel captain, your free will mind, is now a subservient crewmember to the captain of the Crown.

Without Prejudice UCC 1.207 / 1-308

Daily Truth Pills - February 3, 2009


Every system of civilized law must have two characteristics: Remedy and Recourse. Remedy is a way to get out from under the law. The Recourse provides that if you have been damaged under the law, you can recover your loss. The Common Law, the Law of Merchants, and even the Uniform Commercial Code all have remedy and recourse, but for a long time we could not find it. If you go to a law library and ask to see the Uniform Commercial Code they will show you a tremendous shelf completely filled with the Uniform Commercial Code. When you pick up one volume and start to read it, it will seem to have been intentionally written to be confusing. It took us a long time to discover where the Remedy and Recourse are found in the U.C.C. They are found right in the first volume, at 1-207 (now 1-308) and 1-103.



“The making of a valid Reservation of Rights preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such rights by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel.” (UCC 1-207.7) (now 1-308)


It is important to remember when we go into a court, that we are in a commercial, international jurisdiction. If we go into court and say. “I DEMAND MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!”, the judge will most likely say, “You mention the Constitution again, and I’ll find you in contempt of court!” Then we don’t understand how he can do that. Hasn’t he sworn to uphold the Constitution? The rule here is: you cannot be charged under one jurisdiction and defend yourself under another jurisdiction. For example, if the French government came to you and asked where you filed your French income tax of a certain year, do you go to the French government and say “I demand my Constitutional Rights?” No. The proper answer is: “THE LAW DOES NOT APPLY TO ME. I AM NOT A FRENCHMAN.” You must make your reservation of rights under the jurisdiction in which you are charged, not under some other jurisdiction. So in a UCC court, you must claim your Reservation of Rights under UCC 1-207. (now 1-308)

Search string for UCC1-308 Canada

December 2015


Click on this button to search for current items reated to the UCC1-308 subsection and its applicability to Canada.

What is a Birth Certificate?

Freedom River WordPress Blog


Your birth documentation should be straightforward and transparent, however it soon becomes the
most complex and secretive paper trail imaginable. This alone suggests a long history of corruption.
The process involves a maze of secret Trusts and various parts of legislation, focused on claiming
your Estate.



The frustration many Americans feel about our judicial system can be overwhelming and often frightening; and like most fear, eventually, with the seemingly tyrannical power of some governmental agency and the mystifying and awesome power of the courts. We have been taught that we must "get a good lawyer," but that is becoming increasingly difficult, if not impossible. If we are defending ourselves from the government, we find that the lawyers quickly take our money, and then tell us as the ship is sinking, "I can't help you with that - I'm an officer of the court."

Freedom River Blog
What Is An Artificial Person?

Freedom River WordPress Blog


This is a great blog on the general legal concepts and arguments on how we have unwittingly given the state jurisdiction over us in the statutory law system because we are essentially victims of fraud, deceipt, and corruption oin a mass scale dating back generations.


Click on the image to be taken to the home page of the blog where you can systematically review page by page by navigating the headings at the top of the site. Although the blog references New Zealand, the same principle applies to any country formed under the British Common Law system, which inlcudes, Canada, the USA, England, Australia, New  Zealand, and most other contries of the world.


Topics you will learn about include:


Freedom River Blog
History of OATHS in Law and Jurisdiction

John-Henry Hill, M.D. Blog


Freedom, Rights and the Common Law


In all of history there has been but one successful protest against an income tax. [Note by JHH: It was the “QUAKERS” in Britain.] It is little understood in that light, primarily because the remnants of protest groups still exist, but no longer wish to appear to be “anti-government.” They don’t talk much about these roots. Few even know them. We need to go back in time about 400 years to find this success. It succeeded only because the term “jurisdiction” was still well understood at that time as meaning “oath spoken.” “Juris,” in the original Latin meaning, is “oath.” “Diction”, as everyone knows, means “spoken.” The protest obviously didn’t happen here. It occurred in England. Given that the origins of our law are traced there, most of the relevant facts in this matter are still applicable in this nation. Here’s what happened.

Download Now
Download Now







Challenge any legal court case brought against you with this one document originally obtained from somewhere on (don't recall exactly where, but a very interesting site nonetheless).

Deceptive IRS Code Words
"Income," "Person," "Taxpayer," "Shall," and "Must."
Learn to Decipher the Internal Revenue Code and IRS Publications 

Hour of the Time Blog


The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is a masterpiece of deception designed to mislead Citizens into believing that individuals are subject to federal income tax. The Code was written by attorneys for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and contains a series of directory statutes using the word "shall", with provisions that are requirements for corporations, but not for individuals. Even members of Congress are generally unaware of the deceptive legal meanings of certain terms that are consistently used in the IRC. These terms have legal definitions for use in the IRC that are very different from the general understanding of the meaning of the words. 


Lack of knowledge of these legal definitions causes misunderstanding by uninformed Citizens who are confused as to the correct interpretation of both the IRC and the true meaning of the tricky wording in IRS instructional publications and news articles. However, when you understand the legal definitions of these terms, the deception is easily recognized and the limited application of the Code becomes clear. This understanding will help you to see that filing income tax forms and paying income taxes must be voluntary acts for most Americans because the United States Constitution forbids the federal government to impose any tax directly upon individuals.


Learn More


IRC 7701(a)(1) does not refer to "person" in the usual sense of a living human being. Rather, Reg. 301.7701-1(a) instructs that the term "person" includes an individual, corporation, partnership, trust or estate, joint-stock company, association, syndicate, group, pool, joint venture or other unincorporated organization or group, guardian, committee, trustee, executor, administrator, trustee in bankruptcy, receiver, assignee for the benefit of creditors, conservator, or any person acting in a fiduciary capacity.


I am not a 'Person', are you? - PDF


bottom of page